Budget
Committee Minutes
MRSD MS/HS,
May 27, 2008
Present Members: James Ells, Neil Moriarty,
Norm Dion, George Tremblay,
Absent Members: Robert Smith.
Others Present: K. Dassau, Superintendent,
D. Hodgdon, Assistant Superintendent of Curriculum and K. Chambers, Business
Manager.
1.
Approval of the April 22,
2008 Minutes: MOTION: N.Moriarty MOVED to approve
the April 22, 2008 Minutes as amended. The amended minutes are on file. SECOND: G. Tremblay. VOTE: 12.277/0/1.238/2.485. Motion passes.
2.
Public Comments: R. Bauries commented that he
would be speaking as a member of the Monadnock Taxpayers Association. He
commented on the health care savings from 12.2% to 2.75%. He said that the
taxpayers did not support the budget and that there is a default budget. Under
a default budget you can not start new contracts or hire people. There is a 2.2
million dollar surplus in the default budget. He said that this could be a
legal problem. He said do not worry because the group would be asking questions
and putting out materials each week.
P. Bauries asked the Budget Committee to put their
minutes on the web site like the School Board does. P. Stuhlatz arrives.
3.
Budget Oversight:
3a. MRSD
Monthly Expense Report: K. Chambers handed out a sheet on the insurance savings. The total
saving for all three districts plus the SAU is $771,893.64. The savings for
Monadnock are $478,491.84. K. Chambers explained that the figure put in the
budget is the guaranteed maximum rate by the insurance company. The District
hired IPG to do the negotiations with the insurance companies for a total of $55,000.00.
She explained that the Districts decided to go with LGC and received the rate
due to pressure and negotiations from IPG. They have done a great job. K.
Chambers handed out a packet of papers. She explained that the remaining amount
in the budget is $4,588,644.22. She anticipates hitting the revenue number but
not going over. She explained that the packet contained the Federal Grants. She
explained that the revenues are lagging but the district would break even.
3b. Major Transfers: K. Chambers explained that the kitchen hood is to
be done this summer. The 2007 Capital Projects have been put on hold due to the
Kaestle Boos Study. Some would be implemented over the summer, not all but a
vast majority. The roofs project is due to start Friday. The gym improvement
bids are to be reviewed tomorrow night and recommended to the Board on June 3,
2008. The Food Service has done a terrific job and is expected to break even.
K. Chambers passed out transfer information to the Committee. She explained the
transfers and that the School Board approved all of them. She explained the
improvements and renovations that would be done to the Wilcox building to
prepare it for the MC2 program. K. Chambers explained that the School Board
Contingency line is the health insurance savings and that the School Board drew
on that to get things accomplished. She explained the transfer for the
Wilderness Trek Program.
4.
Review potential Budget
Surplus: K.
Chambers explained that the amount remaining is $ 4,588,644.22. She would
expect that there would be a $500,000.00 surplus that would be turned back. The
Finance Committee would be making recommendations to the School Board for up to
$500,000.00 of the surplus. They would recommend that the Mt. Caesar and the
high school roofs of 1990 and older be completed and to fill the oil tanks,
replace some textbooks and some computers, replace some furniture that is
original to the building, install proper storage for hazardous material and
other items. K. Chambers explained that she has checked with the Dept. of
Revenue and roofs do fit the bill. The School Board has the authority under RSA
30 2:10 to spend the surplus. They have bottom line authority. N. Moriarty
commented that the nurse’s office should be fixed. It was mentioned in the last
two NEASC Reports. The School Board should take a stand and not let the nurse’s
office hang. K. Chambers explained that we need to spend this year, by the end
of June. We would not have a final floor plan for the nurse’s office. We are
going to ask the NEASC if the plan would fix the problem. If it would we plan
to go forward. In the default we do not have the facts and figures. N. Moriarty
commented that the NEASC is a group of teachers and administrators. K. Chambers
commented that they said they would respond. W. Lechlider asked if we could
assume that B. Mitchell is backlogged. K. Dassau commented that he heard a
suggestion of avoiding the bidding process and giving the job to a particular
vendor. The Board is moving ahead. K. Chambers commented that B. Mitchell is
doing a fantastic job. The weight room is complete. He is working at 210%. K.
Dassau commented that the budget was developed in Dec. 2006. The surplus is
less than 3%.
5.
School Board Liaison Report:
5a.
Curriculum: D.Hodgdon
reported that the School Board has established an Education Committee, chaired
by J. Carnie. The first topic was the NEASC. D.Hodgdon explained the results of
the tests that were taken last fall. He said that there are some significant
improvements. They do not get us out of a School In Need of Improvement status
but we are moving toward 100% proficiency by 2014. There have been strong
improvements in Sullivan and at Emerson.
5b. Facilities: K. Dassau reported that the gym floor and the roofs are
going to be worked on and the weight room is complete. The Education Committee
voted to support the NEASC. The Facilities Committee also uses the NEASC Report
to support their projects. On June 3,
2008 there would be a Kaestle Boos presentation.
5c. Direction: K. Dassau commented that
it is premature. This is the first time through a Facilities Study. K. Chambers
explained that the Master Plan is built on an educational program. What we have
and need in the future and what facilities we need to support it and bring it
up to code. It is not a proposal but it identifies items. N. Moriarty has
volunteered to be the liaison to meet with the Finance Committee.
6.
Vision 2008-09:
6a. Public
opinion: P.
Stuhlsatz reported that historically Roxbury has supported the budget and
education. They have a good voter turn out. Personally it is very easy to
support spending. This is a District in trouble and we need to fix it. You can
not fix it without spending money. We need to spend the money.
J. Tommila commented that the funding formula
District wide is unfair.
K. Stark commented that they have the second highest
assessment.
G. Tremblay commented that
J. Gomarlo commented that she hears things at meetings. She said that parents are willing to spend the money. It is an accountability issue with the people that grew up here. The key is communication. She can not believe that things keep tanking themselves.
D. Ott commented that Gilsum is one of the Northern towns a distance from Swanzey. There is a feeling of hopelessness. The town is carefully looking at Surry. People are at a wait and see attitude. There are a lot of people who do not care.
T. Ellsworth commented that in Sullivan there are some that are very much in support of the District. Information is an issue. The selectmen’s fire is lit by one voice. The Northern Schools are a half an hour away. The barrier is a problem.
N. Moriarty commented that K. Chambers and K.
Dassau produce a lot of information, more than ever.
Lynn Rust asked if we could request the numbers and why we are spending more than the state average. K. Dassau explained that he is willing to do an analysis. He said that they do support education.
N.Dion commented that a lot of people in
P. Richmond commented that Swanzey voted to support. The voter turn out was not a landslide. We need to get more people involved.
J.Ells commented that he does not feel that Swanzey or the District gives a damn. He said that it is sad but he does not know the answer. Everyone commented on the support of the maintenance items but the buildings are falling down. There are problems in curriculum, education and taxes. There is no quick fix. We need to get more people involved.
M. Morrison commented that the kids did badly on the test. That is the end result for the dollar. The teacher’s contract is a potential problem. We are not keeping teachers. We have a problem with leadership in the schools. He hoped that the science tests are higher and a pitch can be made.
J. Ells commented that the parents need to be more involved in their child’s education.
6b. Goals/Direction: W. Lechlider commented that there is not enough information yet. N. Moriarty commented on a petition that he said would kill any bond issue that comes up. W. Lechlider asked if this group is willing to make the budget flat and get behind a bond or get behind something to pick away at the problems. What are you people willing to get behind. J. Ells commented that the Budget Committee needs to receive the budget early. T. Ellsworth suggested hammer it out here and get united before the public. P. Stuhlsatz explained that the function is not to make policy but to analyze the numbers as proposed by the School Board. This Committee has been meddling in policy. N. Moriarty commented that the committee has done it different ways. J. Gomarlo commented there are so many things in the budget set. Is there something big we want to get behind but we are not sure of what is coming up.
7. Teacher’s Contract-Special Meeting: W. Lechlider commented that J. Ells made a motion at the last meeting to support the teacher’s contracts. That motion was not to address the special meeting. We did not give a position on the special meeting. K.Dassau commented that it is a packaged deal. If there is no special meeting there is are no contract. C. Kahn would like to hear a vote for the special meeting and give the support to the teachers. She would ask someone to make a motion. J. Tommila does not agree with it being an emergency. He would like to hold the teachers off until March. The teachers had an opportunity on the health insurance and they refused to vote. The teachers did not get their contracts so they had a walk out. He said to tell him that this is an emergency as he read the salaries of some of the teachers. He said that it would make a lot of people mad to go for a vote now. K. Dassau explained that the Board has filed and the first hearing is on June 12, 2008. It is happening. The School Board supported the contract but the public at large does not. Support your elected officials. N. Moriarty commented that it is correct that it has been filed. The 2008 March warrants are a total. This issue is a real hold up. W. Lechlider commented that Attorney Apple said that this would move through Superior Court. K. Dassau commented that he does not have a crystal ball. Three science teachers are resigning and there have been no raises since 2005. The train has left the station. He thought that the vote to support the teachers done at the last meeting was the same as the special meeting. P. Richmond commented that we might save the teachers that may be leaving. This is perfect timing. We are at risk of loosing teachers. K. Dassau said it sends a positive statement to the teachers. MOTION: P. Richmond. MOVED that the Budget Committee show their support for the special meeting. SECOND: J. Ells. DISCUSSION: MOTION: N. Moriarty. MOVED to table the motion. Failed for lack of second. N. Moriarty would challenge the chair. P. Stuhlsatz commented that any motion needs a second. MOTION: J.Gomarlo MOVED to suspend Robert’s Rules for the duration of the meeting. SECOND: P. Richmond. VOTE: 9.031/3.480/2.501/0.988. Motion passes. Dr. Kaplan read to challenge the chair from the website. J. Ells commented that the request for a special meeting is perfectly legal. We can stand behind them or not. G. Tremblay commented that it feels messy that we the Budget Committee vote on a special meeting. We voted on the contracts. J. Ells commented that was a point well taken. N. Moriarty called to move the question. VOTE on support of special meeting: 8.441/4.329/2.242/0.988. Motion passes. MOTION: J. Ells MOVED to have Robert’s Rules govern the Budget Committee meetings. SECOND: P. Stuhlsatz. VOTE: 12.770/0/2.242/0.988. Motion passes.
8. Review/Adjust/Set Budget Committee Meeting Schedule: The next meeting would be on June 24, 2008 at Emerson. W. Lechlider would encourage the committee to attend the Kaestle Boos Presentation on June 3, 2008.
8a.
9. Any other items the committee wishes to discuss: N. Dion commented on the excellent discussion under number 6. He said that it is important that everyone reads the NEASC Report than you have a sense of the most important things. K. Dassau explained that the report is on line.
10.
Set next
agenda: June 24, 2008 at 7:00 PM at Emerson Elementary.
11.
Superintendent’s
Comments: K. Dassau commented that he appreciated the candor. He commented
that he would suggest a part-time public relations person to get information
out to the public.
12.
Chair
Comments: W. Lechlider commented that the committee is down the right road.
There are a lot of positives. He would urge everyone to attend the June 3, 2008
School Board Meeting.
13.
Public
Comments: C.Kahn thanked the Committee for their support of the special
meeting. She had assumed that the Committee was in favor at the last meeting.
C. Kahn explained that the teachers did not take a vote on the Cigna Plan because we needed more time to find out about them. They hoped to find something positive. It did not happen. It took 5 unions and none of them took a vote. The teachers are being singled out. When J. Tommila read the salaries those were teachers with master degrees and years of experience. He commented on 29 teachers calling in sick out of 199 in the District. That is not a huge percentage. She explained some of the excuses that the teachers had. She suggested too let things go. We need to move things forward on a positive note. There are a lot of teachers leaving and the positions to fill difficult.
Dr. Kaplan commented that the teachers are tired of being blamed for not going with Cigna. The Budget committee has not been true themselves. The Budget committee needs to represent the public. Going against your Board is mistrust. When a decision is made you need to back it. You need to present a united front.
N. Moriarty commented that the Support Staff does not have right to refusal.
MOTION: N.Moriarty MOVED to adjourn at 10:00 PM. SECOND:
P. Stuhlsatz. VOTE: Unanimous
for those present. Motion passes.
Respectfully
submitted,
Laura L.
Aivaliotis